Robert Sawatzky
Jul 1, 2020

World advertisers lack consensus on withholding social media ad spend over hate speech

TOP OF THE CHARTS: Largest share of WFA members remain undecided about whether to pause spend, even though a majority have had conversations with the platforms about hate speech.

World advertisers lack consensus on withholding social media ad spend over hate speech

With a growing list of global advertisers pausing their social media spending amid concerns over the proliferation of hate speech, the World Federation of Advertisers has polled its members on the issue, but found no strong consensus. 

The survey was released late last week before heavyweights like Unilever, Coca-Cola, Diageo, Starbucks and Levi's joined the boycott and before Facebook tweaked some content policies. It found that only 5% had decided to withhold spend, though a quarter of advertisers felt likely that they would. The largest portion (41%) remained undecided, even though the WFA's public position is that the platforms need to do more. 

A majority of WFA members (53%) said they have had conversations with the platforms about their policies on hate speech, suggesting they do not feel uninformed on the issue.

Nearly half of the global advertisers (48%) said their main approach was to work through industry bodies like the Global Alliance for Responsible Media for change. Many members suggested they were also actively reviewing the role of social media in their marketing mix, getting advice from their media agencies and communicating with their peers.  

Member commentary likewise reflected a diversity of opinion:

It's simply depressing [the platforms] still fall short. If they don't adjust based on calls from consumers and stakeholders, we would appreciate support with identifying viable alternatives for investments so our markets can have a clear choice of media owners that can secure business outcomes. Perhaps competition is the only way to get [them] in particular to change.

Neither platform is perfect, nor advertisers and the marketers behind them. Advertisers may pull out from these platforms but most of the consumers will not. 

Strongly believe that taking a constructive approach is the right thing to do, but sending a signal to [the platforms'] leadership is probably needed to create a stronger sense of urgency. 

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

10 hours ago

Alibaba pledges 'aggressive' AI investment, reports ...

Revenue jumped 8% as Alibaba's AI-driven strategy paid off. A surge in investor confidence has sent its share price soaring over 60% since the start of the year.

11 hours ago

Five by Five Global to deliver AI-powered campaigns ...

Can creativity truly be compressed? Former Cheil Australia MD Mark Anderson, now at Five by Five Global, is betting big on AI with a new seven-hour sprint model to find out.

15 hours ago

BBDO launches new global vision to focus on bolder ...

'Do Big Things' will empower brands to take risks, make noise, and tackle the world's biggest problems with bold solutions, says global CEO Nancy Reyes.

16 hours ago

Is Elon Musk’s X winning back advertisers?

Social media platform X is reportedly in talks to raise money at its buying price valuation of $44 billion, despite user and advertiser losses since Elon Musk’s acquisition in 2022.