Bob Hoffman
Jun 8, 2020

Carnival of hypocrisy: Brands, BLM and taxes

THE AD CONTRARIAN: If brands really believe that Black Lives Matter, they must stop hiding their taxable profits in offshore tax havens.

A screen capture from a Nike ad released May 29.
A screen capture from a Nike ad released May 29.
"By 2017, American companies had put at least $2.6 trillion into offshore tax shelters...Nike had $12.2 billion.... The company estimates that if its $12.2 billion was repatriated to the US, it would owe $4.1 billion in US taxes... Designating its profits this way allows the company to avoid paying even a dime of US income taxes on these profits..." The Oregonian

The horrible murder of George Floyd was treated by the marketing industry last week as an opportunity to express sincere desire for change. Sadly, it also exposed our talent for hypocrisy.

While brand marketers were exhorting us to end practices that cause social damage to black Americans, they were themselves deeply engaged in some of the most pernicious practices.

I have my own standard for evaluating a company's true commitment to social justice. It is this: to what extremes does it go to avoid paying taxes?

Taxation may be unpleasant. Tax dollars are often squandered on idiotic schemes. Paying taxes may reduce a corporation's returns to investors. But taxation is by far the most potent source of resources for societies to redress social ills. Taxation funds education. Taxation funds housing. Taxation funds health initiatives. Taxation funds social programs.

There is no way around this—when corporations take extraordinary measures to avoid paying taxes, they are doing extraordinary harm to citizens who have the greatest need for education, housing, health, and social programs. If brands really believe that Black Lives Matter they must stop starving governments of the resources to improve black lives by hiding their taxable profits in offshore tax havens. Like it or not, to a substantial degree, taxation is the engine that funds social justice.

There will be those who say that these tax dodges are perfectly legal. In many cases they are. This fact impresses me not one bit. If you're going to use social media or paid media to pound your chest about social justice, you have a higher responsibility than just to obey the letter of the law. There is little honor in being legally compliant and ethically opportunistic.

Dear business colleagues: If you really want to help heal the US here's step one: Pay your fucking taxes. Until you're willing to do that, please instruct your marketing departments to spare us the high-minded pieties.

Let's make this so simple that even a CEO can understand it: You can't be for social justice and against paying taxes.


Bob Hoffman is the author of several best-selling books about advertising, a popular international speaker on advertising and marketing, and the creator of 'The Ad Contrarian' newsletter, where this first appeared, and blog. Earlier in his career he was CEO of two independent agencies and the US operation of an international agency.

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

2 days ago

40 Under 40 2024: Swyn Evans, Zeno

Evans has demonstrated dynamic leadership as managing director at Zeno Singapore, driving client wins, revenue growth, and championing team welfare and women’s advancement in just eight months.

2 days ago

Happy Lunar New Year from Campaign Asia-Pacific

The editorial team is slithering away for a short break, but we'll be back with our newsletters and ready to charm on January 31st.

2 days ago

'Fear doesn't build trust': Cisco's CMO on why ...

CMO Carrie Palin reveals why consumer trust, impact-readiness surrounding AI, and in-person connection might be the keys to sustain the company’s future.

2 days ago

Stand guard: Protecting your brand from the hidden ...

The traditional reactive approach to risk management is grossly inadequate for the age of AI-powered marketing, says Mediabrands Australia’s Geoff Clarke.