Kenny Lim
Nov 13, 2009

StarHub, SingTel squabble over Premier League content proposal

SINGAPORE - Singapore's two leading telcos are currently locked in a war of words in the local media over StarHub's proposal to carry SingTel-branded Barclays Premier League (BPL) and ESPN Star Sports channels.

StarHub, SingTel squabble over Premier League content proposal
SingTel bagged the exclusive broadcast rights to the BPL, the crown jewel of pay-TV content in the city-state, in October, which has since sparked off a series of competitive sports content promotions by both telcos. StarHub is expected to lose subscribers once its coverage of the BPL comes to an end.

SingTel’s CEO Allen Lew started the war of words by describing StarHub’s offer to host SingTel content as “three years too late”.

A statement issued by StarHub, the city's second-largest telco, retorted: “References to what could have been proposed three years ago have no relevance." 

The statement continued: “We could say the same about a number of things in the telco space that our competitors could have done over the past 10 years that would have made the playing field more level. So, rather than going into a discussion on what could have been done years ago, it would be more fruitful to move on and discuss what can be done for consumers going forward.”

StarHub also highlighted the need and benefits for a new universal set-top box rather than introducing another proprietary set-top box for local consumers.

“It is very clear that most StarHub TV customers who want access to BPL in the future while also enjoying the other branded content from StarHub do not want to wrestle with two set-top boxes, more wiring and multiple connections. The sub-agenda for each of us is transparent. Each operator would like to have its set-top box as the preferred box in the home. That is one reason why StarHub is making the proposal, and the only reason why our competitor would not accept it. But we believe our agenda is very much aligned with public interest and consumers' wishes.”

According to one local industry source, the ongoing dispute could mean something is in the works behind the scenes.

The source pointed out that the furore is not just about the broadcast of the BPL and sports content but rather the wholesale carriage of channels by one broadcaster.

He added that in overseas markets, there are deals in which pay-TV operators can share and buy content and channels, but the intense rivalry between the two local telcos has stifled this opportunity which would boost the pay-TV industry in the city-state. 

Related Articles

Just Published

13 hours ago

40 Under 40 2024: Mamaa Duker, VML

Notable achievements include leading VML through a momentous merger, helping to reel in big sales, and growing WPP’s ethnic and cultural diversity network by a mile.

13 hours ago

Will you let your children inherit a world without ...

A raw, unflinching look at the illegal wildlife trade, starring Ray Winstone, will force you to confront the horrifying truth... and act.

14 hours ago

Campaign CMO Outlook 2024: Why marketers still want ...

In the second part of the Outlook series, global marketers weigh in on Amazon Prime’s move into ad-tier streaming, how video-on-demand will reshape strategies, and where it's still falling short.

16 hours ago

Jaguar's identity crisis: A self-inflicted wound ...

Jaguar's baffling attempt at reinvention from feline grace to rock-based abstraction is a masterclass in brand self-sabotage, says Resonant's Ramakrishnan Raja—and it risks destroying the marque entirely.